Make Pancake Batter Wife Sunbathing Back Yard Video Funny

June 24, 2022 Post a Comment

Response to trumad (Original post)

Fri Sep 14, 2012, 01:01 PM

115. My wife sunbathes in my backyard, nude, on a regular basis. So does my daughter.

My backyard is surrounded by tall hedges and solid fences. There is no way anyone can see in without really working to get a view.

If someone snuck a camera over the fence and posted nude pix of my wife or daughter on the Internet..well, they'd need an ER when I was done with them. The jailtime would be well earned.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

211 replies	Author	Time	Post
Today's simple lesson: If you don't want pictures of you topless to go public----- [View all]	trumad	Sep 2012	OP
That's an embarrassing thing for a potential employer to bring up at the interview	4th law of robotics	Sep 2012	#1
:)	pinboy3niner	Sep 2012	#3
Well, he is unemployed and has been living on Government Aid his entire life.	FSogol	Sep 2012	#8
Typical welfare-princess	4th law of robotics	Sep 2012	#10
English anchor babies. n/t	FSogol	Sep 2012	#15
Yeah, they can always sell some stock if times get tough.	renie408	Sep 2012	#11
Or borrow $20-30k from their parents and start a business.	FSogol	Sep 2012	#14
He's actually not unemployed	laundry_queen	Sep 2012	#25
Yes, I have to hand it to both of those guys.. they DO work!	DavidL	Sep 2012	#53
Actually, he's currently a commissioned officer in the RAF.	GoCubsGo	Sep 2012	#184
Beh-taahahaha!!!!	louis-t	Sep 2012	#110
Who cares? Kate is a woman.	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#2
Uh--- that's not the point of the thread.	trumad	Sep 2012	#4
And if they shot the photos through the windows of th Private Villa?	edhopper	Sep 2012	#6
What is the point of the thread, then, trumad?	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#24
Ugg...	trumad	Sep 2012	#32
Right. You don't care...	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#43
We should never, ever become outraged over something that happens...	LanternWaste	Sep 2012	#79
+1	antiquie	Sep 2012	#34
All that matters is that she cares. nt	NCTraveler	Sep 2012	#13
Nah. The only thing that's wrong with this whole	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#20
ahhn the simple world you live in	trumad	Sep 2012	#39
"Tabloids sell because people love shit like this. "	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#42
Absolutely true. What I am looking for is real factual news not sensation and that is all the tabs	jwirr	Sep 2012	#57
Its a French magazine : not a tabloid.	dipsydoodle	Sep 2012	#62
I was quoting another poster.	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#81
Hadn't realised that	dipsydoodle	Sep 2012	#150
"...why would anyone be titillated by seeing Kate Middleton's breasts?"	Blue_Tires	Sep 2012	#70
regardless of whether a woman is receptive to the idea or not. nt	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#71
no, consent factors into it...	Blue_Tires	Sep 2012	#76
So, can I assume that trumad's post led you to search for the photos?	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#72
I'll take a look when I'm not at work...	Blue_Tires	Sep 2012	#93
"tit"illated? LMAO	L0oniX	Sep 2012	#102
No other word fits nearly as well.	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#125
You're blaming Kate? Seriously?	cynatnite	Sep 2012	#5
Wow! Is that what you got from this.... ??	trumad	Sep 2012	#23
She wasn't in public...she was in a private villa...	cynatnite	Sep 2012	#28
Agree 100 percent	trumad	Sep 2012	#35
She was not in public. She was at a private villa with the expectation that she had privacy....	cynatnite	Sep 2012	#38
Hard to have an expectation of privacy when you know there are super zoom cameras and a	Lex	Sep 2012	#45
This message was self-deleted by its author	cynatnite	Sep 2012	#54
Yes, this.	treestar	Sep 2012	#158
all I know it their security SUCKS	elehhhhna	Sep 2012	#180
Just a small note	nadinbrzezinski	Sep 2012	#194
On photography and the "right to privacy"...	regnaD kciN	Sep 2012	#92
Some people think that celebrities have no privacy. Such as the papparazzi, for instance.	Zalatix	Sep 2012	#134
EXACTLY! I am amazed that a simple moral issue has such heated discussion here.	alp227	Sep 2012	#168
Unfortunately, when you become a member of the English Royal Family, you lose some "freedoms"	blueamy66	Sep 2012	#171
If someone had used a mega zoom lens to spy on the Obama girls...	cynatnite	Sep 2012	#175
I guess that I just don't see the need to sunbathe topless.	blueamy66	Sep 2012	#176
YOU don't see the need to sunbathe topless.	randome	Sep 2012	#177
No, like members of the English Royal Family.	blueamy66	Sep 2012	#182
You don't, but many women do both in public and in private. Kate was in private...	cynatnite	Sep 2012	#179
I disagree.	blueamy66	Sep 2012	#183
yes Mr. Assagne we all know it is the woman's fault...	whistler162	Sep 2012	#199
Good advice! (pic warning)	RandiFan1290	Sep 2012	#7
Oh god, that is just painful to look at!	smirkymonkey	Sep 2012	#185
I preemptively uploaded topless pics of myself on Facebook this morning....	cbdo2007	Sep 2012	#9
Link?	L0oniX	Sep 2012	#104
I agreee...these inbred tools are only famous because they have	joeybee12	Sep 2012	#12
So, if I had 50 paparazzi following me and promoting me for absolutely no reason, I'd be famous!	cynatnite	Sep 2012	#19
Happy to help...	joeybee12	Sep 2012	#29
That wasn't your point?	cynatnite	Sep 2012	#33
I don't get why anyone cares, really. It's France.	Jennicut	Sep 2012	#16
Exactly! nt	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#21
Exactly. Sounds like she's ashamed. If I looked like her I'd be	Lex	Sep 2012	#47
She has boobs! So do I.	Jennicut	Sep 2012	#55
if we do not want our boobs on the net for a man to jack off to, per a poster on this thread	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#61
But you're not, so hers is the opinion that matters. (nt)	Posteritatis	Sep 2012	#107
Apparently the word "if" confuses you.	Lex	Sep 2012	#126
if you're gonna start the thread, at least post the photo...	Blue_Tires	Sep 2012	#17
+1	L0oniX	Sep 2012	#106
I prefer to say: if you don't want to be shamed for being topless, don't be American	DonRedwood	Sep 2012	#18
Going topless in a PRIVATE VILLA	Le Taz Hot	Sep 2012	#22
See post 23	trumad	Sep 2012	#26
They were at a private home. n/t	cynatnite	Sep 2012	#30
No matter	trumad	Sep 2012	#36
It does matter. She had every reason to feel that she could relax in privacy...	cynatnite	Sep 2012	#40
The point is---	trumad	Sep 2012	#41
It's like saying she asked for it. n/t	cynatnite	Sep 2012	#56
Bingo. And then telling us where to look to see the photos.	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#74
BS. She had EVERY REASON to anticipate such intrusion.	TheMadMonk	Sep 2012	#186
Agree 100%	JSK	Sep 2012	#173
Yes, if you're a woman, you should keep yourself covered at all times.	randome	Sep 2012	#178
Outdoors and visible from a public street (nt)	Nye Bevan	Sep 2012	#37
I think it depends	aint_no_life_nowhere	Sep 2012	#44
Yes, I saw your "fucking point" before I posted.	Le Taz Hot	Sep 2012	#46
This.	redqueen	Sep 2012	#50
It's another version of "she asked for it". n/t	cynatnite	Sep 2012	#59
Yeah, but putting the blame there won't stop it from happening, either.	randome	Sep 2012	#77
I don't get why your point is so goddamned hard for some people here to understand. Guh. (nt)	Posteritatis	Sep 2012	#113
Check how American courts have ruled	nadinbrzezinski	Sep 2012	#195
First Harry's ass, now Kate's breasts!	Nye Bevan	Sep 2012	#27
I will never understand why we as humans are so afraid of our bodies	Drale	Sep 2012	#31
Ever hear of PRIVACY?	alp227	Sep 2012	#169
I never go topless in public. I just forget my pants.	HopeHoops	Sep 2012	#48
what a ridiculous argument that others dont have a problem with a woman exposed, SHE should not	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#49
My question is why do they care?	Drale	Sep 2012	#51
Because her privacy is violated?	alp227	Sep 2012	#170
Here's what I don't get. The Palace knows this can happen.	no_hypocrisy	Sep 2012	#52
That was my point as well	Blue_Tires	Sep 2012	#108
I'm not "ashamed" of my body but that doesn't mean I want my nude pictures published in a tabloid.	redqueen	Sep 2012	#58
THANK YOU! THANK YOU!	alp227	Sep 2012	#172
I agree with you.	KitSileya	Sep 2012	#206
It's against French law; but the magazine will pay the fine	muriel_volestrangler	Sep 2012	#60
Comment from Closer UK.	dipsydoodle	Sep 2012	#66
Italian magazine plans 26-page special on topless Kate photos	dipsydoodle	Sep 2012	#188
Lots of $$$$$$ stands to be made from the sale of these pictures. Who cares that what she wants.	redqueen	Sep 2012	#189
I can't believe you really mean that.	dipsydoodle	Sep 2012	#192
You're right. I don't.	redqueen	Sep 2012	#196
surely they won't be making $$$ since these countries are so much more sophisticated and dont care	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#203
And now the Irish Daily Star, part-owned by Richard Desmond	muriel_volestrangler	Sep 2012	#190
Richard desmond has announced ending the joint venture	dipsydoodle	Sep 2012	#200
ya know... for all thsoe saying boobies not a big deal, seems all these countries and newspapers	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#204
This message was self-deleted by its author	bupkus	Sep 2012	#63
what makes you think it is about YOU? are we really so void in our ability to respect another	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#64
This message was self-deleted by its author	bupkus	Sep 2012	#133
brilliant post. it was a big enough fuckin deal to the woman whose privacy was invaded	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#145
This message was self-deleted by its author	bupkus	Sep 2012	#151
Pity the royals and other celebs	tama	Sep 2012	#167
This message was self-deleted by its author	bupkus	Sep 2012	#181
So...people shouldn't go nude in the privacy of a private area?	Alduin	Sep 2012	#65
For the record, that magazine is owned by . . . . wait for it . . . .	Stinky The Clown	Sep 2012	#67
This message was self-deleted by its author	bupkus	Sep 2012	#152
Publishing the pictures was in bad taste.	dipsydoodle	Sep 2012	#68
No it wasn't.	Atman	Sep 2012	#83
it is always nifty when a man tells a woman, that has had privacy invaded, how SHE should feel	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#85
Oh, you again.	Atman	Sep 2012	#95
you said she should not be bothered. who are you to tell her how she should feel. i HOPE	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#98
No, I did not say "she should not be bothered."	Atman	Sep 2012	#112
ha. i really doubt that she has an issue with people standing up for HER right to take off top	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#122
I think you just enjoy being outraged.	Atman	Sep 2012	#129
mmmm, seems like you are having much more from being outraged at my supposed outrage	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#146
I am stunned that some don't get this point.	trumad	Sep 2012	#163
"She's a celebrity" doesn't make stalking okay, much as you seem to insist otherwise. (nt)	Posteritatis	Sep 2012	#100
I didn't say it makes stalking OKAY! Jesus F. Christ!	Atman	Sep 2012	#105
Every post where you put the onus on anyone other than the paparazzi, for one. (nt)	Posteritatis	Sep 2012	#109
That is just ridiculous.	Atman	Sep 2012	#120
Tell me,	tama	Sep 2012	#166
True, but the publisher is in the "sales" business, not the "taste" business...	Blue_Tires	Sep 2012	#96
No need for that lesson	taterguy	Sep 2012	#69
A quote from the great Ronnie Mund	Inkfreak	Sep 2012	#73
What's totally pathetic is that the public even cares about women covering our breasts.	Zorra	Sep 2012	#75
this was france, not america. where boobs should not make headlines and they did. against a womans	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#84
It appears that you completely misunderstood my post. I apologize for not being more clear.	Zorra	Sep 2012	#159
what i don't get with your post, is this happened in france. where being topless is no big deal. YET	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#160
"The pictures almost certainly won't be published in Britain,	Zorra	Sep 2012	#161
She could shut the whole thing down very quickly...	Atman	Sep 2012	#78
Bullshit	leftynyc	Sep 2012	#80
I'll bet Queen Elizabeth never went topless even in a private location.	WI_DEM	Sep 2012	#82
I have no idea why this is considered such important "news".	PavePusher	Sep 2012	#86
It's not even news, really.	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#89
Spew warning, please...	PavePusher	Sep 2012	#91
It is a great word, isn't it?	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#97
Onomatopoeia.	randome	Sep 2012	#101
Probably, even in the Latin.	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#116
Fess up, trumad...	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#87
I haven't looked it up....	PavePusher	Sep 2012	#88
"you helped publicize them"	Upton	Sep 2012	#137
What horror?	MineralMan	Sep 2012	#141
Well I went over to Free Republic to see if I could find them...	trumad	Sep 2012	#164
Interesting thread reactions. Something similar once happened to a famous man	Bluenorthwest	Sep 2012	#90
"Folks here went to 'breats, we are prudes we are animals, men are this, women are that'...	redqueen	Sep 2012	#130
I think I get the point you are making.	The Link	Sep 2012	#94
how far away do you have to be	ProdigalJunkMail	Sep 2012	#99
The funny/sad/scary part will come when	Blue_Tires	Sep 2012	#103
let's take that down a notch...	ProdigalJunkMail	Sep 2012	#111
Oh, yeah -- I keep forgetting about those...	Blue_Tires	Sep 2012	#117
probably...	ProdigalJunkMail	Sep 2012	#119
Have you seen Google's new 3D city maps?	Atman	Sep 2012	#123
but, is it ok THEN to use the image?	ProdigalJunkMail	Sep 2012	#124
I don't know. These are issue which will have to be adjudicated as technology moves forward.	Atman	Sep 2012	#135
i'm going to take this down a dark, disturbing road	ProdigalJunkMail	Sep 2012	#139
Actually, I think most of the things you mentioned are illegal.	Atman	Sep 2012	#143
that is my point	ProdigalJunkMail	Sep 2012	#144
In a world where corporations are people and money is free speech...	Atman	Sep 2012	#147
i was thinking about this. how easy to blame her. what IF.... they spent a half hour looking at	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#118
don't even need a tree anymore	ProdigalJunkMail	Sep 2012	#121
Yeah, kinda.	Atman	Sep 2012	#127
do you think you should ever have the expectation of privacy?	ProdigalJunkMail	Sep 2012	#131
Of course I do.	Atman	Sep 2012	#138
"you and I will probably never have to worry about this"	ProdigalJunkMail	Sep 2012	#140
The same thing has happened to Diana, Jackie K O, and Fergie. They should have known.	appleannie1	Sep 2012	#114
My wife sunbathes in my backyard, nude, on a regular basis. So does my daughter.	Xithras	Sep 2012	#115
Too much is made out of nudity	liberal N proud	Sep 2012	#128
There's (amazingly enough) a bigger issue here...	brooklynite	Sep 2012	#132
a nation like france that is so sophisticated they do not care about nudity uses pictures of a	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#149
"Yeah I know they were in a private villa"	Warren Stupidity	Sep 2012	#136
French laws about privacy are VERY strict;	closeupready	Sep 2012	#142
They already have....	joeybee12	Sep 2012	#148
I'd bet that William feels enthusiastic about suing their	closeupready	Sep 2012	#154
Royals launch legal action after topless Kate Middleton photographs in French Closer magazine	dipsydoodle	Sep 2012	#153
Good.	closeupready	Sep 2012	#155
good. thanks. read maybe on this thread, UK closer is pretty pissed at france's closer, also. nt	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#157
Good news, it is not the US	nadinbrzezinski	Sep 2012	#197
And women who dress suggestively should expect to be raped?	Blue Idaho	Sep 2012	#156
You have a reasonable expectation of privacy	hifiguy	Sep 2012	#162
Check us law in similar cases	nadinbrzezinski	Sep 2012	#198
They are	tama	Sep 2012	#165
Doesn't seem like such a 'simple' lesson anymore, does it?	randome	Sep 2012	#174
here would be the position of photographer, and the distance.	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#187
Fucking hell. nt	redqueen	Sep 2012	#191
That's a long distance	Generic Other	Sep 2012	#193
The side issue of that	dipsydoodle	Sep 2012	#202
Today's simple lesson -- don't go outside to expose your naughty bits.	Major Hogwash	Sep 2012	#207
yup. right on. nt	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#208
The pictures are so blurry I can't be sure it's Kate	RegieRocker	Sep 2012	#201
What part of private doesn't the	ohheckyeah	Sep 2012	#205
That's right, blame the victim.	NashvilleLefty	Sep 2012	#209
so many have decided she should have known that just was not isolated enough	seabeyond	Sep 2012	#210
yeah, let's say you're topless in your fenced backyard...	ibegurpard	Sep 2012	#211